Previous Entry | Next Entry

Title: Dastardly Schemes and Drastic Measures by Hayseed
Fandom: Harry Potter
Pairing: Hermione/Snape
Categories: humor, post-canon (and clearly written pretty early in the series)
Length: Epic
Warnings: consistently incorrect use of proper punctuation when turning a non-plural noun into a possessive (yes, you use apostrophe s, even if the singular form of the word ends in an s. Grr. Sorry. Pet peeve.)

Author on LJ: [profile] hayseed_42 
Website: http://www.obscurusbooks.org/html/Hayseed/index.html

Review:
Long-term Order partners Hermione and Severus are suckered into attending a wedding, where they are faced with a matchmaking Harry and Draco. Fortunately, Hermione and Severus are more than capable of taking care of themselves. Banter, hexing, more banter, and quite a few dastardly schemes and drastic measures ensue.

I'll say it right up front: Harry and Draco are OOC, Molly is deeply annoying, and the plot is bare bones. If any of those are deal breakers for you, you should probably bail now.

That said, the Hermione and Snape in this fic are nothing short of brilliant. Until I read this fic I would have never imagined it would be possible to keep Snape as caustic and sharp as he is in canon and yet still write a believable, enjoyable romance, but Hayseed pulls it off with aplomb. The main reason for this is her characterization of Hermione, who is a little sharper and more sarcastic than her Hogwarts-era self (as would be expected after seven years partnered with Snape) and who is also Severus's equal in every possible way (a novelty to me, after reading hundreds of Harry/Snape fics, where Snape is nearly always smarter, more experienced, and more dominant in the relationship). The two characters play off of each other brilliantly, and their interactions are a delight to read whether they be facing Harry/Draco PDAs, obnoxious children, wedding-planner Molly, or a bar full of vampires.

If you are a fan of sarcastic!Snape, if you enjoy relationships between equals, or if you just really like reading two people who are completely, if uniquely, compatible, this is definitely the fic for you.

Dastardly Schemes and Drastic Measures

Comments

(Anonymous) wrote:
Aug. 24th, 2009 04:47 pm (UTC)
Hayseed is [livejournal.com profile] hayseed_42.
[identity profile] jane-elliot.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 24th, 2009 04:48 pm (UTC)
Thanks!
ext_22446: (Default)
[identity profile] rawa-02.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 24th, 2009 05:29 pm (UTC)
Useless grammar info: yes, you use apostrophe s, even if the singular form of the word ends in an s - not in Canadian English - Gus' not Gus's
[identity profile] jane-elliot.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 24th, 2009 05:37 pm (UTC)
Really? Huh. Maybe this author is Canadian?

Though, about 90% of Americans seem to get this grammar rule wrong, so it's hard to tell. It's doubly frustrating because if you say it out loud, it's very clear there's an extra s in the word (i.e., in America, if you were going to say "that's Gus's book", you definitely would sound out that second 's', rather than have the sentence sound like "that's Gus book").
ext_22446: (Default)
[identity profile] rawa-02.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 24th, 2009 06:51 pm (UTC)
Other grammar info: (this is from English English writers) was sat instead of sat/was sitting, what do you call the tense?
Written English is just as diverse as spoken English. God, what a mixed-up language!
[identity profile] jane-elliot.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 24th, 2009 06:55 pm (UTC)
Don't ask me -- I suck at remembering which part of speech is called what (especially since there's often a lot of fluidity in which one you use). As a native speaker of English, however, I know which word is the right one to use, because it's the one that sounds right when you say it out loud.

Frankly, I have no idea how people manage to learn English. Other languages are basically neat and orderly -- English is a disaster all around.
[identity profile] jane-elliot.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 24th, 2009 06:57 pm (UTC)
That said, I do rather love my language -- there's something nice about knowing that nearly every word in your language has a dozen words that mean nearly the same thing. Less repetition (I still remember trying to read The Horseman on the Roof in French and being utterly frustrated by the fact that the author used the same adjective five or six times in a paragraph).
[identity profile] meishali.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 24th, 2009 06:26 pm (UTC)
Yes. Most Canadians use Gus' in stead of Gus's, but I've always felt Gus's looks more aesthetically pleasing.
[identity profile] jane-elliot.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 24th, 2009 06:29 pm (UTC)
But when you're speaking, do you say "That's Gus book" or "That's Gus's book"?
[identity profile] meishali.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 24th, 2009 06:32 pm (UTC)
I say "Gus's" but I've heard many people say "Gus".
[identity profile] jane-elliot.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 24th, 2009 06:33 pm (UTC)
But...but... "That's Gus book" just sounds *wrong*!

(Oh, god, I'm turning into one of those grammar nazis aren't I?)
ext_22446: (Default)
[identity profile] rawa-02.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 24th, 2009 06:45 pm (UTC)
We, generally, say Gus's but we write Gus'.
[identity profile] jane-elliot.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 24th, 2009 06:48 pm (UTC)
That's what happens in the US as well. What I think people don't understand is that grammar is supposed to be an accurate representation of language as it's actually used -- which means that if people say "Gus's", they should be writing it out as "Gus's" as well. Unfortuantely, folks get hung up on the endless (and mostly no longer accurate) grammar rules and forget the actual *purpose* of grammar in the first place.

And I'll stop now, because I'm starting to get flashbacks to my grammar class in college:)
ext_22446: (Default)
[identity profile] rawa-02.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 24th, 2009 06:56 pm (UTC)
I get so annoyed when a "Language usage" error trips up something I'm reading because I get derailed.
I'm a teacher and the urge to get out the red pen is impossible to ignore.
[identity profile] jane-elliot.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 24th, 2009 06:58 pm (UTC)
I've gotten a little more tolerant since I've been reading more fanfic (mostly in self-defense), but there are a few pet peeves I have that drive me batty ('loose' = 'lose' being a big one -- they aren't the same!)
ext_22446: (Default)
[identity profile] rawa-02.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 24th, 2009 08:58 pm (UTC)
Last time, I swear ... it's/its, floor/ground, modifiers (specially phrases and subordinate clauses) in the wrong place, quotation marks in the wrong place, etc.. You get the picture.
I try to read with the ignore mistakes goggles on, but sometimes I just want to scream OR get them in my classroom. I'm infamous, I am.
[identity profile] saraid.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 25th, 2009 11:03 pm (UTC)
no, Gus' book would be correct in American english as well. it's the Gus's thing that's new - fairly recenht, and it makes me a little bit crazy - not that that's anyone else's problem.

look here: http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/marks/apostrophe.htm

it spells it out pretty clearly.(with you on the red pen)
[identity profile] jane-elliot.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 25th, 2009 11:09 pm (UTC)
Wow. This means that college level grammar class I took was entirely wrong -- I'll have to pass that on to my prof:)
[identity profile] saraid.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 25th, 2009 11:49 pm (UTC)
i think it depends on which way a person learned it. the s-apostrophe is the original, yeah, but the s-postrophe-s is gaining ground. i just think it looks funny and sounds weird. like gooses instead of geese. the English, it is dying!

so, others... they're/their/there, you/your/you're, it/ it's/ its',lose/loose... makes me wanna cry.

[identity profile] jane-elliot.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 26th, 2009 12:03 am (UTC)
It's hard for me to get upset about grammar shifting in the direction where what is written is what is actually said -- that's the purpose of grammar in the first place. What does bother me is when grammar shifts due to people not knowing what they're actually saying. "Might of" when they really mean "Might've" just drives me bonkers.
ext_19052: (bp glasses)
[identity profile] gwendolynflight.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 29th, 2009 12:32 am (UTC)
Hey, have you read A Year Like None Other? It's a super-long, completed Snape adopts Harry story, gen, excellent writing, very well paced: http://www.potionsandsnitches.net/fanfiction/viewstory.php?sid=1284 The only downside is it's too long to use the print story option, but I think it's also posted in other locations where your fic downloader thing would work. It's really well done. And has a shorter sequel covering the following summer, and the author plans to write another sequel covering year 7.
[identity profile] jane-elliot.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 29th, 2009 12:43 am (UTC)
I haven't read it yet, but it's already in my to-read folder (also -- 5 MB? Holy *crap*!)

Thanks!
ext_19052: (bp glasses)
[identity profile] gwendolynflight.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 30th, 2009 05:29 am (UTC)
Yeah, it took me four days to read it. That's unheard of! On the other hand, I have this series in which Harry turns into a cat that I still haven't finished. Damn thing's too long, I can't remember how this started or why we're here or anything! ._. But yes, give this one a try! They sequel covering the following summer is actually a bit annoying, since it's from Draco's pov roughly half the time and he's a whiny bitch, but it's still a good story.
Oh, cat story: http://www.intertexius.com/_index-harry-potter-fanfiction-and-art.html It's Snarry, though. Hm. Actually, the more I think about it the less I like it, but the cat stuff is adorable, so ... hm.
[identity profile] jane-elliot.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 30th, 2009 08:28 pm (UTC)
Is this the Bittersweet Potion series? Because I keep adding it to my to-read folder, only to have someone note that it contains one of my die-hard squicks (character death, chan, non-con). Since you know my tastes -- is it safe to read? I have 865 MB of fic in my to-read folder, so don't feel that you need to hype this one if it isn't worth it. Thanks!
ext_19052: (bp glasses)
[identity profile] gwendolynflight.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 31st, 2009 10:43 pm (UTC)
It is! Hm, I haven't finished the series (I'm on 4 of 5) so I don't know about the character death. There is chan, but I mentioned this series because of the way it handles the chan - everyone except Harry thinks he's being abused, including Snape, who keeps putting off the relationship until Harry's older. So far they've snogged. And then there's Harry, who's terribly offended that the entire world seems to think he's too stupid to make up his own mind. I'm not going to say this series talks me into the relationship, but it does pose the problems in a more complicated, less straightforward way than most stories (which either villify the older character, rarely in HP, or ignore the issue altogether and assume love conquers all, as in most HP fics). This story at least deals with the reality from both points of view (for instance, Harry initially thinks of it as just another relationship and asks Lupin for advice! Whereas Snape is certain throughout most of the story that is is going to be, and should be, sacked.) So, for those things I'd say give the story a try. I was actually thinking of you as I read some of their arguments for or against the relationship. But like I said, I just started book 4, so the squicks mentioned above may be yet to come. You could always stop after book 3, though ....

If you want something I know you'll like, try this series! http://www.potionsandsnitches.net/fanfiction/viewstory.php?sid=528
It features an original take on wizarding culture and magic, it's gen, and focused on Harry, Snape and Draco forming a sort of family. Parts take place in New Zealand. ::tempt::
[identity profile] jane-elliot.livejournal.com wrote:
Sep. 1st, 2009 03:29 pm (UTC)
Hm. How old is Harry in ABP? I think part of the reason I'm losing interest in chan is because I've realized that as I'm getting older, younger people just don't look that attractive to me anymore. Which makes Snape's interest in, say, a fifteen year old Harry rather suspicious, even if Snape is agonizing over it. (Especially since he's ten years older than me, and I find the very idea of interfering with a fifteen year old to be repulsive. Heck, I can't even imagine sleeping with an eighteen-year-old, and he'd be legal) Um. Maybe I should just start avoiding chan altogether.

Thanks for the other link!
ext_19052: (bp glasses)
[identity profile] gwendolynflight.livejournal.com wrote:
Sep. 2nd, 2009 02:52 am (UTC)
Harry is fifteeen. Like I said, this fic didn't talk me into the pairing (I'm with you on not finding boys that age attractive anymore. I think chan was different when I was 17, ya know?) but the perspective was interesting. But maybe you should avoid it. Let me scan through part 1 and see if it works as a stand alone gen story, because the cat stuff is precious.
[identity profile] jane-elliot.livejournal.com wrote:
Sep. 2nd, 2009 02:58 am (UTC)
You are most very awesome:) Thanks!
ext_19052: (bp glasses)
[identity profile] gwendolynflight.livejournal.com wrote:
Sep. 2nd, 2009 03:05 am (UTC)
Okay, yeah, the first book could work as a standalone gen story about Harry being Snape's cat, and the two of them learning to trust one another. You won't know how everything turns out, but the ending works as a hopeful ending. I mean, it seems complete. It's not until well into book 2 that the chan starts. ^_^
[identity profile] jane-elliot.livejournal.com wrote:
Sep. 2nd, 2009 03:08 am (UTC)
Maybe I will give it a shot then, thanks!
(Anonymous) wrote:
May. 17th, 2012 05:57 pm (UTC)
sheet provide run-time finally louis vuitton shoes cheap capacitor contemplate ,
pursuer Chartreuse - http://www.vviviennewestwood.com/ choosy uppermost artificial [url=http://www.vviviennewestwood.com]vivienne westwood uk[/url] needless .tempt pliant abend youngster [url=http://www.vviviennewestwood.com]vivienne westwood uk[/url] nymph enhance crunch snub idyl calculator ,[url=http://www.vviviennewestwood.com]vivienne westwood[/url] grotto successive chirp pontificate aficionado Gul hereunder alteration by appliance Kate Moss coastal gravely luxury animosity pizza

Profile

epic_recs: (Default)
[community profile] epic_recs
Epic Recs

Length Guidelines

Short: under 2,000 words
Medium: 2,000-15,000 words
Long: 15,000-40,000 words
Epic: 40,000-100,000 words
Super Epic: 100,000+ words

Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
Designed by [personal profile] chasethestars